Apparently, installing ntp in Debian results in your clock being corrected, with no proof whatsoever that the correction took place, and the amount of any such correction. An obvious security flaw, if you ask me. On the other hand, in the Linux land, that’s probably just another day.
Заказал тридцатого декабря местного времени FreeBSD8 сервер с IPv6 под новогоднюю скидку. С самого начала, IPv6 адрес вообще не работал — очевидно, у сервера забыли настроить gateway. Починили в течение суток после обращения в поддержку.
Потом оказалось, что firewall (ipfw) вообще тоже не работает. На IPv4 просто-напросто не влияет на пакеты, а на IPv6 — даже не выключается и не включается (нет прав на изменение `sysctl net.inet6.ip6.fw.enable`). Перезагрузка сервера (2012-01-03/04) не помогла, после перезагрузки всё так же сплошные нули по `ipfw show`, и выдаётся ошибка при добавлении правила 65535. В течение недели после запроса каким-то образом молча вроде стал работать IPv4 числа эдак седьмого (причём работает очень подозрительно: элементарное правило, которое ловило ssh пакеты во FreeBSD6, на новом FreeBSD8 пакеты не ловит, пропуская пакеты к более высоким правилам), а про IPv6 до сих пор вообще ничего. При этом сам запрос числится закрытым (нет иконки про то, что над ним кто-то всё ещё работает), последнее сообщение датировано седьмым числом, «В течение ближайшего времени проблема будет устранена. Приносим извинения за неудобства.», проблема до сих пор присутствует десять дней после последнего сообщения, ETA отсутствует.
Так что, резюмируя, даже сами IPv6 адреса не работают — никто интернетом без firewall’а в наши времена не пользуется. :-( Дополнительно, даже ipfw на IPv4 глючит. В прибавку, за все эти проблемы ещё нужно целый рубль каждый месяц выкладывать! Грабёж среди бела дня! ;-)
Подробнее: http://forum.firstvds.ru/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=8060&start=30#p41737
What can I say? HGST provides an excellent example of how you should NOT be running your web-site.
% http_ping -count 4 -interval 1 "http://www.hitachigst.com/internal-drives/deskstar/deskstar-7k1000d"; date 29131 bytes from http://www.hitachigst.com/internal-drives/deskstar/deskstar-7k1000d: 3544.97 ms (7.376c/3485.42r/52.173d) 29131 bytes from http://www.hitachigst.com/internal-drives/deskstar/deskstar-7k1000d: 3694.24 ms (8.122c/3612.4r/73.713d) 29131 bytes from http://www.hitachigst.com/internal-drives/deskstar/deskstar-7k1000d: 3228.26 ms (7.236c/3160.14r/60.882d) 29131 bytes from http://www.hitachigst.com/internal-drives/deskstar/deskstar-7k1000d: 3626.39 ms (19.465c/3558r/48.926d) --- http://www.hitachigst.com/internal-drives/deskstar/deskstar-7k1000d http_ping statistics --- 4 fetches started, 4 completed (100%), 0 failures (0%), 0 timeouts (0%) total min/avg/max = 3228.26/3523.46/3694.24 ms connect min/avg/max = 7.236/10.5497/19.465 ms response min/avg/max = 3160.14/3453.99/3612.4 ms data min/avg/max = 48.926/58.9235/73.713 ms Sun 15 Jan 2012 19:05:01 PST
3.5s to generate a static 29k web-page? Repeatedly, three and a half seconds? Are they nuts or what? You can certainly notice the slowness as you try to navigate the actual site, so this is not some kind of test artefact.
No, seriously, how can you slow do a static web-site like that? Someone, please explain? The site doesn’t even have any kind of shop or anything. Entirely static!
We’ve all heard that the fcc.gov et al has spent 350 million USD on the National Broadband Map. Has anyone actually bothered to visit it recently?
http://www.broadbandmap.gov/about-provider/at&t-inc./nationwide/ T
http://www.broadbandmap.gov/about-provider/verizon-communications-inc./nationwide/ VZ
http://www.broadbandmap.gov/about-provider/surewest-communications/nationwide/ SureWest in Sacramento, CA
http://www.broadbandmap.gov/about-provider/cincinnati-bell-inc./nationwide/ Cincinnati Bell in Ohio
I’ve looked at it repeatedly just now, and I have no idea what those numbers are, or how they could be useful to anyone who is interested in broadband. Keep in mind, I’m an engineer, fascinated with math and numbers. I have no idea what a regular person would be doing with any of those numbers. Numbers by each provider simply make no sense. SureWest has all zero-dot-something percentages, so does Cincinnati Bell. I found no option on the site to get the numbers to make any kind of sense. Was BroadbandMap.Gov simply designed to be the map of AT&T and Verizon coverage?
Yet, apparently, according to the map, even AT&T doesn’t offer FTTP to anyone! If you’ve heard people discussing their FTTP, they must simply be confused by the marketing, AT&T doesn’t actually offer, as BroadbandMap.gov unambiguously puts it, “Optical Carrier - Fiber to the End User”. Also, Sonic.net and Paxio.net are myths, they don’t exist, and don’t offer anything to anyone, let alone any Gigabit speeds for mere pennies on the Mbps! So is Webpass.net, they don’t offer 200/200 speeds for 45$/month in San Francisco Bay Area, either.
Also, apparently, AT&T doesn’t even use VDSL2. Note that VDSL2 is not “Asymmetric xDSL” technology; VDSL2 is symmetric and capable of 100/100 speeds at 0.5km loop lengths. Surprise, surprise!
Another note is that AT&T does offer 6Mbps upload speeds… Hmm… Note that there’s a single page for wired and wireless divisions… Yeap, you’ve guessed it — 6Mbps uploads is the artefact of the wireless networks. :-) No 6Mbps upload luck for any U-verse users!
Written for, and discussion at, http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26762551-AT-T-U-verse-on-BroadbandMap.Gov.
A couple of months earlier, I’ve got a ZyXEL NBG4615 and a NETGEAR WNR3500L GigE 802.11n routers in the attempt to replace my buggy 2Wire. Anyhow, it seems like neither one wants to work with my static ip setup, trying to NAT my static subnet instead of simply passing it through.
The WNR3500L is marketed by NETGEAR as their “open-source router”. So, what does this actually entail?
First off, NETGEAR has been selling the v2 version of 3500L since the summer of 2011, in other words, since about 5 months ago, and there is still not a single open-source firmware released for the “open-source router” WNR3500Lv2, which has been on the market, as just mentioned a sec ago, for almost half a year now!
Second, what is actually behind all those firmwares, that are advertised to work with 3500L? The myopenrouter.com has a whole list!
DD-WRT.com. Turns out, it has become commercial a few years back, and either way, the last update for the 3500L firmware, and the whole release in general, is dated quite a while back; seems like the whole project is no longer really active or engaged in much development. I cannot believe they haven’t had any bugs in about 2 to 4 years since the last v24 release in 2008/2009. Supposedly, IPv6 wouldn’t work by default, either. In addition, it seems like DD-WRT has a history of GPL violations itself, and in general seems kinda fishy. Some good story about DD-WRT and stuff at http://bitsum.com/about-ddwrt.htm, not sure how much is true, but I think stuff adds up very much so.
OpenWrt.org? Seems interesting, and seems like it’s probably the one I might be interested in using, since they have a CLI philosophy (by default comes with no GUI?), and seem to be really a true OSS project, instead of being a commercial product disguised to be an OSS one like DD-WRT. But, apparently, the official web-site states that WNR3500L is not supported, or, only “may be supported”. WTF?
Tomato. Apparently, a few variations exist, and the project indeed sounds interesting. The last official incarnation is called TomatoUSB.org, but it has been stagnant for a little over a year, too. Might be worth checking out, however, IPv6 GUI is only available in git, without any official builds yet, supposedly.
Now, let’s go back to myopenrouter.com. The site is a joke. NETGEAR pays a company called CaptiveNetworks.com to run the site for them, and CaptiveNetworks employs some annoying lamer to act as an administrator of the site. The site is a questionable and made up fake “community”, full of confused users, unsorted info and mods of questionable origins. Apparently, some mods they publish are authored by anonymous users which don’t even have any kind of web-site whatsoever! Imagine, running software on your gateway that’s been written by a guy named Toastman, who hosts this said software on some file host web-site, with no contact information, or changelogs, or anything. Nice, eh? Nothing against Toastman personally, seems like a nice guy with a friendly userpic, and I’m sure his builds are good, too.
Anyhow, the whole open router thing is a big disappointment. Should probably find an x86 box, and install pfSense or even straight my own version of OpenBSD. Shuttle XG41 with dual GigE, DDR3 and LGA775 for 154 USD seems like an attractive offer, LGA775 Dual-Core 45nm Wolfdale processors start at just under 50 bucks (Celeron and Pentium). The http://pcengines.ch/alix2d13.htm and «Netgate m1n1wall 2D13 Red» (http://store.netgate.com/-P218.aspx) seems very interesting, too, although with shipping and stuff, it’s essentially in the same price range as a GigE solution for a mere 100Mbps system. However, pcengines.ch is definitely much more competitive than the overpriced Soekris (checkout their official stores: PC Engines Alix.2d13 (LX800 / 256MB / 3 LAN) costs only 115 USD! Enclosures are 10 bucks! Compare to Soekris, where similar net5501-60 runs for 253 USD, over twice as much!), so I do have a feeling that when their GigE solutions will come out, it’ll make a very reasonable x86 router.
I’m looking for a robust consumer router that can do the simplest routing function of all — simply forward packets between the WAN and LAN interfaces. The option of NAT’ing the RFC 1918 addresses would be awesome, too.
Spoiler alert: after several very long conversations with ZyXEL NA tech support (including the managers; by the way, ZyXEL’s tech support is outsourced to Anaheim, CA), I was told that noone makes such devices for the consumer market at all. Is that really true?
I have a 99.124.xxx.xxx/27 Static IP address allocation from AT&T U-verse FTTP; however, the way it worked with 2Wire is that you still get a single regular “dynamic” IP address via DHCP from their common and shared 76.220.xx.xx/22 pool, through which all your traffic to your static IP addresses (in a totally different subnet, as you may have noticed) is then routed. The 2Wire 3800HGV-B then has a setting called “Public Networks” → “User Defined Supplemental Networks”, where the user has to manually specify the allocation they have received; subsequently, for each individual device on the LAN (as well as in the default options for the LAN DHCP server itself) you can either assign a public address from the public pool, or a private address from the private pool (with the option of specifying which public address the private address will be NAT’ed to). However, I’m getting rid of 2Wire PoS due to the unlimited number of bugs, stability issues, as well as unacceptable power consumption (2× to 3× higher than the devices below, without even supporting GigE or 802.11n).
Prior to buying the routers as below, I’ve tried connecting my OpenBSD netbook to the Ethernet port on the SBC ONT directly, to see if I can indeed ditch 2Wire 3800HGV-B PoS, and after some playing with `ifconfig` and `route`, indeed was I getting all the packets for the static block from the internet without any problems!
I’ve got a ZyXEL NBG4615 to replace 2Wire, then subsequently NETGEAR WNR3500L to replace ZyXEL. Both were (and still are) marketed as routers. When setting up each, I’ve changed the MAC-address to the one used by 2Wire, and set up my /27 subnet to be used for their LAN interfaces. Apparently, both ZyXEL and NETGEAR happily do NAT of publicly routable IP addresses instead of passing it straight, and neither one can do packet forwarding (also known as “routing”, surprise!) between the WAN and LAN interfaces without the NAT.
The ZyXEL does have an option of disabling NAT, so, according to their interface, it’s all supposed to work just dandy. However, apparently, in practice it doesn’t do any routing between the two interfaces once the NAT is disabled (I presume they erroneously also do something like `sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=0` or `sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward=0` when you disable NAT), so my internet simply stops working immediately and as soon as I disable NAT within their interface. I’ve contacted the ZyXEL tech support, and they seem to misunderstand what routing is all about, they also claim that no consumer-oriented router can do routing without [also] doing NAT. Is that really true?
In any case, I tell them they have a clear bug with their user interface not functioning the way anyone would expect it to, yet they repeatedly conclude that they’ll only address the problem if other comparable products on the market also have the feature (“have implemented their own feature set correctly”, they mean?). Pardon me, but how are the obvious bugs in one’s interface are related to any other products by any other manufacturer? Especially if all that’s concerned is literally a one-byte change (0 to 1, that’s merely a bit even!); strike that, most likely is merely a matter of actually removing one or more lines of code that disables ip forwarding through sysctl when NAT is disabled through the interface. After all, this GigE router is based on Linux 2.6, from what I gather and based on nmap.
The NETGEAR doesn’t have any options to disable NAT in their default firmware. Although, to be fair, I would argue that having a default of doing NAT of non-RFC1918 addresses is a major bug in and of itself, and any NAT-disable options in any interface are only really meant to apply to the RFC1918 addresses in the first place.
So, just out of curiosity, any consumer routers that can actually do the simple routing, please?
Is AT&T’s setup of two different subnets (as explained above) really so uncommon in the ISP world to not get any attention of third-party consumer router manufacturers?
Am I actually doing something wrong, and is this whole thing supposed to be configured some other way? Or is this really too advanced and is not supposed to work with consumer off-the-shelf routers at all?
Any firmwares to recommend for WNR3500L that were actually thought out to be a great fit for packet forwarding and multiple routable IP addresses, over two subnets as above? I just want my subnet to work, nothing too fancy, really. That said, it would be disappointing to actually have fewer features than what was available back with 2Wire, e.g. it would be nice to continue having the ability to have two IP-address pools for my LAN, one public and one private. A SIP registration server, HE’s IPv6 TunnelBroker.net support and authoritative DNS would be a plus, too, though. SNMP won’t hurt, either. (-: Looking for something stable that I could install with uptime of months, and which would not break when I need to make simple changes of adding new LAN devices etc.
P.S. BTW, apparently, the ZyXEL tech support guys in Anaheim quite misunderstand what routing between two interfaces is all about. They claim that I want some kind of “advanced router”, whereas their product only offers NAT routing (what is “NAT routing” anyways? do they mean “routing + NAT”?), disregarding the fact that they explicitly have the option of disabling NAT in their interface, where the router is still advertised to be in the Router mode (they have a separate option to select the Mode between Router Mode, Access Point Mode etc). I assume that their NAT-disable option not only disables NAT, but also sets `sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward` to 0. ZyXEL tech support suggested all sorts of things, from using the router in bridge mode, and configuring my host computers to be on my /27, yet somehow have me specify the AT&T gateway from the shared /22 (I’m, like, really?).
Written for, and discussion at, http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26754312-Any-consumer-routers-that-can-do-routing-
У domenus.ru хорошие цены и быстрая круглосуточная поддержка по телефону, однако интерфейс доволно скудный. Дополнительно, если вы вдруг использовали их ns1.domenus.ru. и ns2.domenus.ru., то при переделегировании доменов, ваши домены мгновенно перестанут работать до того момента, пока зона .su/.ru не обновится, т.к. их интерфейс, очевидно, мгновенно удаляет записи с их собственных DNS серверов ещё до того, как корневые зоны обновятся.
Я это заметил на практике, т.к. один из доменов перестал работать в процессе переделегирования, но можно и просто посмотреть на то, как отвечают их серверы — оба являются рекурсивными. Крайне не рекомендую использовать ns1.domenus.ru.
First off, the FreeBSD documentation regarding Java is just terrible outdated.
However, it’s pretty easy once you get the gist. `pkg_add -r openjdk6` is all that was needed to get `java` and `javac` onto the FreeBSD 8.2 VDS 8-stable system. However, `pkg_add -r tomcat7` didn’t work as expected, since, apparently, it depends on java/jdk16, so it tries installing jdk-1.6.0.3p4_27, and fails, not installing tomcat7, either. Also, it seems like tomcat7 tries installing a bunch of other packages of questionable benefit, probably due to the java dependancy?
In any case, I guess just about all java software on FreeBSD (and is it only java software?) has to be installed with the —no-deps option. Indeed, `pkg_add -r —no-deps tomcat7` worked just perfectly fine, without any perl or python dependences that it seemed to try installing earlier just for tomcat7, and `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat7 onestart` was successful in bringing dependentless tomcat7 up and running, as casual on port 8080.
Anyhow, it shows a few things: documentation in FreeBSD is indeed very outdated; ports tree dependencies are still quite horrible and reasonably broken; yet Java actually seems to work on FreeBSD with little initial effort. :-)
This is seriously the highest level of incompetence for a hosting company that claims to be the number one in the Russian market for virtual dedicated servers. The company is actually owned (or otherwise has roots) to ISPsystem, the people who make the FreeBSD VDS thing, together with a number of (rather horrible, must I say) control panels (the FreeBSD virtualisation itself that they offer seems nice, although given the other parts, I’d not be surprised if it’s equally horrible deep within, too).
Below is a session from a brand new VDS server from firstvds.ru, created 2011-12-31. Notice that they’ve been offering IPv6 addresses since a few months ago, since 2011-10-14.
cvs# time traceroute www.netbsd.org traceroute to www.netbsd.org (204.152.190.12), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 gw.webdc.ru (188.120.247.254) 3.283 ms 0.479 ms 0.446 ms 2 92.63.108.89 (92.63.108.89) 0.329 ms 0.797 ms 0.581 ms 3 xe012-438.RT.MR.MSK.RU.retn.net (87.245.254.61) 1.375 ms 3.878 ms 1.553 ms 4 xe000-8.RT.TLX.NYC.US.retn.net (87.245.233.114) 124.487 ms 124.173 ms 123.801 ms 5 nyiix.r1.lga1.isc.org (198.32.160.95) 124.964 ms 125.565 ms 126.134 ms 6 int-0-5-0-0.r1.pao1.isc.org (149.20.65.137) 199.516 ms 199.786 ms 199.262 ms 7 int-0-0-1-0.r1.sql1.isc.org (149.20.65.10) 202.798 ms 202.221 ms 203.148 ms 8 www.netbsd.org (204.152.190.12) 196.944 ms 199.323 ms 196.995 ms 0.006u 0.009s 1:01.06 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w cvs# time traceroute6 www.netbsd.org connect: No route to host 0.000u 0.020s 0:05.29 0.3% 24+136k 0+0io 1pf+0w cvs# time host www.netbsd.org ;; reply from unexpected source: 188.120.242.64#53, expected 127.0.0.1#53 www.netbsd.org has address 204.152.190.12 ;; reply from unexpected source: 188.120.242.64#53, expected 127.0.0.1#53 www.netbsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:3:7:2e0:81ff:fe52:9a6b ;; reply from unexpected source: 188.120.242.64#53, expected 127.0.0.1#53 www.netbsd.org mail is handled by 10 mail.netbsd.org. 0.007u 0.061s 0:03.52 1.7% 1935+475k 0+0io 14pf+0w cvs# cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver 188.120.247.2 nameserver 188.120.247.8 nameserver 82.146.59.250 cvs# dig cvs.su ;; reply from unexpected source: 188.120.242.64#53, expected 127.0.0.1#53 ; <<>> DiG 9.6.-ESV-R5 <<>> cvs.su ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27038 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;cvs.su. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: cvs.su. 2560 IN A 188.120.242.64 ;; Query time: 10 msec ;; SERVER: 188.120.247.2#53(188.120.247.2) ;; WHEN: Sat Dec 31 08:03:37 2011 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 40 cvs# time dig cvs.su ;; reply from unexpected source: 188.120.242.64#53, expected 127.0.0.1#53 ; <<>> DiG 9.6.-ESV-R5 <<>> cvs.su ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 40280 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;cvs.su. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: cvs.su. 2560 IN A 188.120.242.64 ;; Query time: 4 msec ;; SERVER: 188.120.247.2#53(188.120.247.2) ;; WHEN: Sat Dec 31 08:03:51 2011 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 40 0.000u 0.006s 0:01.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w cvs# ifconfig igb0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=1bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4> ether 00:1e:67:05:9b:5e inet 188.120.242.64 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 188.120.242.64 inet6 2a01:230:2::10d prefixlen 64 nd6 options=3<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active igb1: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=1bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4> ether 00:1e:67:05:9b:5f media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ipfw0: flags=8801<UP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 65536 lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM> cvs# uname -a FreeBSD cvs.su 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 r112:113: Mon Dec 19 08:17:00 IRKT 2011 root@freebsd8-amd64.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/amd64/compile/ISPSYSTEM amd64 cvs# netstat -rn netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem: No such file or directory Routing tables rt_tables: symbol not in namelist cvs#
Note that it’s supposed to come with IPv6, for which they do actually charge you 1 RUR monthly fees, but the extra IPv6 (was part of the order) doesn’t actually work at all.
This is in addition to them not actually providing any IPv6 name servers, neither local nor authoritative (the .su and .ru do actually already support IPv6).
In addition, notice the fuck up with the nameservers that they specify: they specify 127.0.0.1, whereas either due to their virtualisation or whatever else, the named doesn’t actually reply from 127.0.0.1, so, nothing that makes any use of any names actually works smoothly, due to obvious security concerns within the resolver software. In turn, this amounts to a delay of at least one second for every name query. The sshd logins, the traceroute, anything, extra multiple-second delays. The whole thing is honestly far below any possible incompetence.
The final remark I have to say in my mother tongue.
Честное слово, ну не дебилы?
# mtr --report{,-wide} 76-220-32-XX.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ; date
HOST: liXXX-XXX Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 184.105.143.85 0.0% 10 0.6 0.6 0.4 1.2 0.2
2. 10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.fmt1.he.net 0.0% 10 0.6 5.2 0.5 11.9 4.8
3. 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.pao1.he.net 0.0% 10 11.4 4.3 0.8 11.4 3.4
4. sjo-bb1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 1.3 3.1 1.1 19.8 5.9
5. las-bb1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 14.1 15.0 14.1 22.7 2.7
6. att-ic-149001-las-bb1.c.telia.net 30.0% 10 23.6 32.0 23.6 38.5 5.0
7. cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net 50.0% 10 35.0 34.8 30.0 39.7 4.1
8. cr2.sffca.ip.att.net 30.0% 10 32.5 36.0 30.2 41.3 4.0
9. 12.122.149.141 50.0% 10 27.3 35.9 27.3 40.4 5.3
10. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
13. 76-220-32-XX.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net 80.0% 10 31.1 34.4 31.1 37.8 4.8
Wed Dec 28 21:17:53 EST 2011
2.|-- 76-220-32-3.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net 10.0% 10 2.2 2.6 2.2 3.6 0.4
3.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5.|-- 12.83.39.137 0.0% 10 1.8 1.9 1.7 2.3 0.2
6.|-- 12.122.200.9 0.0% 10 45.4 17.5 2.9 105.5 33.7
7.|-- 208.51.134.1 0.0% 10 4.9 10.5 4.9 58.4 16.8
| `|-- 192.205.32.46
| |-- 192.205.32.50
| |-- 208.178.58.185
8.|-- po1-20G.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net 0.0% 10 5.3 5.1 5.0 5.3 0.1
9.|-- Hurrican-Electric-LLC.Port-channel100.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net 10.0% 10 40.7 42.3 36.2 49.4 4.4
10.|-- 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net 50.0% 10 40.3 47.4 40.3 51.9 4.3
11.|-- linode-llc.10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.fmt1.he.net 60.0% 10 40.8 38.9 36.7 40.8 1.7
12.|-- li163-159.members.linode.com 20.0% 10 39.4 39.4 38.2 41.2 1.1
Wed 28 Dec 2011 18:18:22 PST
2.|-- 76-220-32-3.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net 10.0% 10 2.2 3.4 2.2 12.3 3.3 3.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.|-- 71.145.0.80 90.0% 10 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 0.0 5.|-- 12.83.39.137 0.0% 10 1.7 3.4 1.7 17.6 5.0 6.|-- 12.122.137.125 0.0% 10 2.8 19.8 2.8 47.5 16.0 7.|-- att-gw.sanjoseequinix.savvis.net 0.0% 10 4.6 10.5 4.5 61.3 17.9 8.|-- er1-te-3-1.SanJoseEquinix.savvis.net 0.0% 10 4.6 24.4 4.5 169.3 52.0 9.|-- cr1-tenge-0-3-5-0.sanfrancisco.savvis.net 0.0% 10 7.0 6.6 6.3 7.0 0.2 10.|-- cr1-tengig-0-0-2-0.losangeles.savvis.net 0.0% 10 16.4 16.4 15.7 17.1 0.4 11.|-- ber1-tenge-2-1.losangeles.savvis.net 0.0% 10 15.7 16.6 15.6 23.4 2.4 12.|-- 209.144.203.214 0.0% 10 16.3 16.2 15.1 17.1 0.6 13.|-- arpnetworks-lax2-gw.cust.trit.net 0.0% 10 33.8 18.9 16.7 33.8 5.3 14.|-- arpnetworks.com 0.0% 10 16.8 16.8 16.4 17.1 0.2 Wed 28 Dec 2011 18:20:24 PST
2.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5.|-- 12.83.39.137 0.0% 10 1.7 1.9 1.6 2.3 0.2
6.|-- 12.122.200.9 0.0% 10 2.9 8.1 2.9 41.8 12.5
7.|-- 208.51.134.1 0.0% 10 5.0 62.9 5.0 199.6 69.7
| `|-- 192.205.32.46
| |-- 192.205.32.50
| |-- 208.178.58.185
8.|-- po1-20G.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net 0.0% 10 5.5 57.7 4.9 228.9 87.6
9.|-- Hurrican-Electric-LLC.Port-channel100.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net 30.0% 10 38.0 39.1 33.9 47.7 4.5
10.|-- 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net 30.0% 10 43.5 45.6 33.1 92.9 21.2
11.|-- linode-llc.10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.fmt1.he.net 60.0% 10 34.2 37.7 34.2 40.3 2.6
12.|-- li163-159.members.linode.com 20.0% 10 38.1 36.7 32.7 40.1 2.6
Wed 28 Dec 2011 18:21:00 PST
Somehow no noticeable ssh packet loss whatsoever, though.
